No, it's not a spelling mistake, but a reflection on the archeologists' illogical interpretation of evidence at the site. In The Stonehenge Observatory a cross-examination of results published by the Ancient Monuments Laboratory of English Heritage exposes the objective of their study to be nothing more than an attempt to place Stonehenge in the British Neolithic. A graph of the continuous timeline produced from the cross-examination (below) shows completion of the Sarsen Circle before work on erecting the Trilithons has commenced, a suggestion that is not only completely impractical, but physically impossible without the use of a crane.

The Stonehenge Observatory offers a plausible reason why evidence of Neolithic activity is scarce and isolated. It also produces a recent scientific study which could place construction of the Bank at 7000BC or earlier - more than 4,000 years before the archeologically proposed date.  Read more ...